New World Order #5: Mind Control part 1 - Media Control

Like always, look up anything that seems incredible. I know I said 9/11 or Mystery Schools part 2 is next, but this is more important and probably should have been #1 or #2.
--

Mind Control. It is basically anything that can be used to affect ones' decision making abilities in a predictable fashion. However the first thing that comes to mind for many is cheap science fiction, or something fiction related ["you mean like in that movie?"] and is thus disregarded. Ironically, this is a form of mind control known as Anchoring. Anchoring is a NLP [neuro-linguistic programming] technique/process that connects one concept, feeling, scent, etc to another, bypassing normal logical processes. Anchoring is a natural process and happens to everyone all the time.

Take for example a young man who accidentally ran over his neighbor's dog. A certain song was playing on the radio when it happened. After the event, every time he heard the song he is reminded of killing the dog. The memories of accidentally killing the dog is anchored to the act of hearing the song. The song and the memories are not logically connected, but nonetheless connected.

By understanding the anchoring process, anchoring can be manipulated to occur. This can be done through suggestion if the subject is in a suggestive state, or by repetition, trauma, and a number of other ways. Keep this part in mind.

Here is a video of anchoring in action [you can find the same video without explanation, as it is the original]:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2tGACz6YVM


Instead of going into all the methods of mass mind control, only one will be focused on in this writing and that is media control.

This method of mind control is based upon one fairly easy to understand concept:
People are like machines. Data goes in, they process the data, and then react to the data. By controlling the data that goes in, one can manipulate the reaction.

For the past thirty years, ownership of the media were in fewer and fewer hands. This means, fewer and fewer people had more and more control over all the media we are constantly bombarded with. This number is constantly shrinking as these corporations congeal through incestuous mergers.

"The number of dominant media corporations has dwindled from 50 in 1983 to 5 in
2006 (see Exhibit 1). These include, in rank order, Time Warner (the largest media firm
in the world), Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, News Corporation (based in
Australia), and NBC Universal. These media businesses’ contribution to their parent
companies amounts to (in billion dollars): $33.73, $22.08, $17.15, $12.56, and $12.44
respectively (Ad Age, 2005). Together these five own most of the newspapers,
magazines, books publishers, motion picture studios, and radio and television stations in
the US, making them a powerful “force in shaping contemporary American life”
(Bagdikian, 2004, p. 4)."
http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/9/4/9/0/pages194909/p194909-4.php

In the old days, as in before the later 80s, news stations competed heavily against each other and could not afford to make reporting mistakes as they will lose viewers. This provided a sort of natural check that the news would be fair and balanced as they could not afford to not be.

The implications of the merging of media corporate entities is best described in this scene from the 1976 movie Network. PLEASE WATCH IT [4 min].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTN3s2iVKKI

But in case didn't watch it [seriously, watch it, you will thank yourself], here is one of the important lines:
"and when the twelfth largest company in the world controls the most awesome god damn propaganda force in the whole godless world, who knows what type of shit will be peddled for truth on this network."

To show that what he is saying IS in fact being done, we will refer to Noam Chomsky's book Manufacturing Consent. In this book, Chomsky focuses on case studies in which news bias was a major influence in public opinion. His specific focus was on news coverage of the Cambodian genocides [Pol Pot] and a genocide of equal caliber, happening at the same time in East Timor. The difference though, is that in East Timor, Indonesians were massacring the East Timorians with weapons provided by the United States. Needless to say, East Timor got very little news coverage.

I am going to quote from the book:
"Propaganda campaigns may be instituted either by the government or by one or more of the top media firms. The campaigns to discredit the government of Nicaragua, to support the Salvadoran elections as an exercise in legitimizing democracy, and to use the Soviet shooting down of the Korean airliner KAL 007 as a means of mobilizing public support for the arms buildup, were instituted and propelled by the government. The campaigns to publicize the crimes of Pol Pot and the alleged KGB plot to assassinate the pope were initiated by the Reader's Digest, with strong follow-up support from NBC-TV, the New York Times, and other major media companies. Some propaganda campaigns are jointly initiated by government and media; all of them require the collaboration of the mass media. The secret of the unidirectionality of the politics of media propaganda campaigns is the multiple filter system discussed above: the mass media will allow any stories that are hurtful to large interests to peter out quickly, if they surface at all."

This book has also been made into a documentary exposing pretty much the same things in the book. You can find the documentary here [approx 3 hours]:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5631882395226827730

However, the idea of media control is still very difficult to believe to most who have been unknowingly indoctrinated into the New World Paradigm. So I will offer more evidence.

In 2002 a book was published entitled Into the Buzzsaw which is a compilation of the accounts of eighteen journalists who either had their stories pulled, careers terminated, or credibility shot due to their pursuance of "black subjects" such as the TWA 800 crash. These are all legitimate journalists who believed in the system until they were squelched for getting too close to the truth.
http://www.amazon.com/Into-Buzzsaw-Leading-Journalists-Expose/dp/1573929727

Here is documentary video of journalists speaking out about how their story had been shut down by Fox News when they decided to pursue the "black subject" of Monsanto Corporation and food control/manipulation, specifically the prevalence of milk in the market from Prosilac [growth hormone] injected cows and the lack of testing for safety. Little did they know what they were getting into, and I will get more into Monsanto and food manipulation [GM foods] in a future installment. This video is a MUST WATCH as well [10 min].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axU9ngbTxKw


Now that we have established that media ownership is in the hands of very few people, and also that it is being used to influence us and in our decision making, we must look at how susceptible we are to this influence.

TV only does one thing. It tells you what to do. You cannot argue with the TV, because it does not care about what you have to say, it will continue to spew forth what is in the programming, and you are to accept it. If you look at someone who is engrossed in a TV show, you will see that they are relaxed, staring at the screen, and is oblivious to everything that is going on around them. This is a trance or suggestible state, and it is in this state that it is easy for subtle things to slip into the subconscious. Remember anchoring? This is when manipulated anchoring takes place.

When you think of Muslims, does it often make you think of terrorism? Have you ever wondered why? It is because these two concepts are anchored to each other in the mind due to the flooding of this kind of propaganda through the media. In fact, Muslims have always been portrayed as the evil backwards villains in television and the movies for over sixty years. Here is a video documenting the portrayal of Muslims throughout media history [5 min].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko_N4BcaIPY

Conspiracy theories likewise are anchored to "crazy paranoid lunatics." Recall the movie entitled Conspiracy Theory in which Mel Gibson plays a crazy paranoid lunatic conspiracy theorist. There are numerous news mentions in which conspiracy is always related to "nutjob." Therefore, for most, conspiracy theory is not a subject to pursue, as they believe conspiracy theories are by definition not true. Here is a good video on this subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqyV5N5O9eY

Here is George W. Bush saying, "let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the events of 9/11. Malicious lies that shifts the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty." It's a great quote because it also contains that certain kind of irony that these occultist elites love.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ

Here is a buried Fox News report, which is NO LONGER ON THE AIR NOR ON THEIR WEBSITE, detailing the Israeli connection of 9/11, which was NEVER PURSUED. Why? Because this does not fit with the story that was being pulled over everyone's eyes [via media control] which is that Muslims are to blame. Remember that Israel does not mean Jews, and I am not trying to be anti-semetic. Rather, remember that in New World Order #2 I said that Israel is the arm of the New World Order responsible for toppling the Old Arabic Order. This is exactly what was being done. Of course, this is never seen again [except by those already in the know, as they know such video exists].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7T4DhDLPrY

TV can make or break presidents. Remember back in 2000 when George W. Bush, whose FATHER was a president, and whose brothers are key players in major corporations, ran as a political OUTSIDER? This image was crafted in part by him, but mostly by the media.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFGHm3Hi-oQ&NR=1

To further drive this point home, we will focus on the campaign of Ron Paul. Here are videos of Ron Paul in debates, he is clearly the best candidate as he is the only one who does not dance around questions and answers every question directly and sincerely. He is also right every time, i.e. declaring that we are in a recession before anyone in the mainstream even toyed with the idea, nonintervention as foreign policy, pull out of Iraq, and so on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPij7fyIiUQ
you can find more videos of his debates.

However, Ron Paul was essentially shut down by the media and was portrayed as a nutjob with no chance to win. He was given little to no air time while the media loved Giuliani, who had less support than Ron Paul. Here are video clips of media censorship regarding Ron Paul. Note the loaded questions, note the consistency of name calling, misrepresentation of his support, and so on. Please at least see the first video, which is a compilation of over 30 clips.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNv_mFI8f5g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlacFmRGPgI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMIm8qsJupY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXCkgz1Y-Bk

It is not only the way subjects are being represented, or shall we say misrepresented, but also in the set up of the programming itself. Most talk shows offer an interview portion lasting about eight minutes. You see, eight minutes is not enough time to divulge any controversial information that is not accepted by the mainstream without looking like an idiot as you are not given the time to provide evidence to back up your claims.

There are many things in the media subliminally creating support for the New World Order paradigm and globalist mindset. This is often done in commercials. First I will tell you how to recognize globalist commercials. They are always very well produced, with a gloomy type lighting but always with cheerful or inspirational/epic music. They will always show people either from Asia or Africa, or some exotic white people place. There may be rare Arabs. They will also likely show white people that are western and average that any westerner might know. Look for them when you watch TV next.

Here is one to get you started:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58bW3bVL7GA

A false world is being pulled over the eyes of the masses. Professor of Philosophy Jean Baudrillard wrote of the blurring of reality and simulation by media in his Simulacra and Simulations,

"If we were able to take as the finest allegory of simulation the Borges tale where the cartographers of the Empire draw up a map so detailed that it ends up exactly covering the territory (but where, with the decline of the Empire this map becomes frayed and finally ruined, a few shreds still discernible in the deserts - the metaphysical beauty of this ruined abstraction, bearing witness to an imperial pride and rotting like a carcass, returning to the substance of the soil, rather as an aging double ends up being confused with the real thing), this fable would then have come full circle for us, and now has nothing but the discrete charm of second-order simulacra.l

Abstraction today is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror or the concept. Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor survives it. Henceforth, it is the map that precedes the territory - precession of simulacra - it is the map that engenders the territory and if we were to revive the fable today, it would be the territory whose shreds are slowly rotting across the map. It is the real, and not the map, whose vestiges subsist here and there, in the deserts which are no longer those of the Empire, but our own. The desert of the real itself.

In fact, even inverted, the fable is useless. Perhaps only the allegory of the Empire remains. For it is with the same imperialism that present-day simulators try to make the real, all the real, coincide with their simulation models. But it is no longer a question of either maps or territory. Something has disappeared: the sovereign difference between them that was the abstraction's charm. For it is the difference which forms the poetry of the map and the charm of the territory, the magic of the concept and the charm of the real. This representational imaginary, which both culminates in and is engulfed by the cartographer's mad project of an ideal coextensivity between the map and the territory, disappears with simulation, whose operation is nuclear and genetic, and no longer specular and discursive. With it goes all of metaphysics. No more mirror of being and appearances, of the real and its concept; no more imaginary coextensivity: rather, genetic miniaturization is the dimension of simulation. The real is produced from miniaturized units, from matrices, memory banks and command models - and with these it can be reproduced an indefinite number of times. It no longer has to be rational, since it is no longer measured against some ideal or negative instance. It is nothing more than operational. In fact, since it is no longer enveloped by an imaginary, it is no longer real at all. It is a hyperreal: the product of an irradiating synthesis of combinatory models in a hyperspace without atmosphere."
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Baudrillard/Baudrillard_Simulacra.html


In summery, almost all media today is owned by about five major corporations. News that don't fit with the "matrix" version of the world are buried, free thinkers are ridiculed, glaring falsities are repeated, stereotypes are endorsed, and so on, all while telling you that they are "fair and balanced."

One thing that people are being conditioned for right now via the controlled media is the idea of an end of days scenario sometime soon. Look for media that implies this message and you will find tons.


Of course, there are countless many ways in which control of the media is affecting the life and daily decisions of the general population, and I have only provided a few of them, as I do not wish to make this writing too long. Just know that there are a lot of falsities being passed off as truth [through bold-faced lying, anchoring, repetition, or a plethora of other ways] and I have only exposed a few. Future installments will focus on specific effects of music and movies, but part 2 of Mind Control will likely be on the MK-ULTRA and other government mind control programs. I hope you enjoyed reading this, peace.

The New World Order Paradigm and How They Control Us

I risk sounding like a crazy "conspiracy loony" but I have come to believe that the New World Order is in motion and will be established in the near future (within the next 50 years or so). I believe this not because of theories but due to facts. The underhanded nature of the implementation of the North American Union is the first tip off that it is probably not something that is in the best interest of the people. Otherwise, it would have been laid out on the table, rather than being secretly agreed upon and then disregarded as "myth" in the mainstream media. In fact, you can find the documents that prove that the plans for NAU is past the drawing board. For example, look up the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), or you could go to the Council on Foreign Relations website, www.cfr.org and do a search for globalization and sovereignty. Oh by the way, all of the major candidates who are running in the 2008 election are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, which is NOT PART OF THE GOVERNMENT. It is a Rockefeller funded group. I say this with the exception of Obama, though his wife is rumored to be in the Illinois Chapter of the CFR. Ron Paul also is not CFR, but McCain, Romney, and Hillary (along with Bill) are all CFR.. Is there really much of a choice?

So to be clear, in this writing, globalization and New World Order (NWO) will mean the same thing. The more I thought about this, the more obvious it became. The NWO is at such an advanced stage right now that it may be near impossible to stop it. This is because the NWO Paradigm is now. What is the NWO Paradigm, you might ask. I will list out what I consider to be characteristic of this artificially generated culture (and then I will go into details for each of them):

1) Gross emphasis on money
Remember when people used to say "money can't buy happiness" and it was truth? Well, these days, people (by people I mean the masses, the general population) are conditioned to view material possessions as happiness, as material possessions are also associated with social standings. To be even more literal, you can buy pharmaceutical drugs tailored to your own liking (don't like hydrocodone? try some oxycodone instead!) to literally bring happiness (unnaturally, but happiness nonetheless). Think about how many people marry for the money, or worse, divorce for the money.

2) Conditioned self-alienation
People are conditioned to see differences between themselves and others rather than similarities. Thus, the individual becomes all-important (the Me Generation) to the point of selfishness (Why should I work if I won't be rewarded? Why should I care about you? etc). This prevents the people from grouping together and therefore becoming strong.

3) Belief that the individual is powerless
Since most people seek to set themselves apart from others, they have become individuals. People have been stripped of their sense of power and therefore, are under the impression that they have no power in the way the world is run and believe that either their votes don't count, or don't care about it one way or the other.

4) The romanticizing of the rich lifestyle (aka pleasure)
This is self-explanatory and ties in with the first. Ever watch Cribs? Or wonder why Paris Hilton is so famous with absolutely no talent?

5) Arrogance
The idea that one is rightfully better than someone else. However, in the NWO style of this trait, it is "justified" in that status is quantifiable based upon material possessions (I have a better car than you, therefore I am better). Arrogance is an inherently human trait. The NWO merely perpetuates it and takes advantage of this. In fact, most of these things in the list are directly related to common human traits that those in power use exploit us.

6) A constant state of both Double Apathy and Double Ignorance
People are kept apathetic of their own apathy and ignorant of their own ignorance. In essence, they don't care that they don't care, and don't know that they don't know. This mixed with arrogance is the ultimate form of mind-slavery in which the individual does not know that they are not free.

7) The emphasis of the here and now
People seem to only care about the here and now, and are so close to Orwellian "doublethinking" it is scary. Remember when Bush said there were WMDs in Iraq and was proven to be completely wrong? Why isn't that a big deal? People still believe the government is completely trustworthy. Is it going to be buried in history like the Gulf of Tonkin? Remember when Bush was talking about how Iran had WMDs and was proven wrong? Why isn't that a big deal? All these things are proven, and yet people just shrug it off as if it were nothing.

All of these ideas are being forced down the throats of the youth, and they love every bit of it. I can say this because I am a part of the group known as the 'youth'. Popular music these days are nothing more than NWO propaganda. Listen to some Lil' Wayne (or actually ANY mainstream hip hop/rap). He's horrible, but people love him. His beats are generic, his rhymes are generic, and all he ever raps about is having lots of money, bitches (sex), and drugs (pleasure), and this is what my generation looks up to. Or how about that Crank Dat Soulja Boy shit? I am just amazed that people can't separate real art (music) from commercialized music full of product placements and just the glorification of the life of excess and pleasure while reason and thought are pushed out of the picture. And what about the TV? The talking picture box? Watch some of the shows such as Cribs, or all those stupid game shows where people go on to do embarrassing things for money. The point is, money drugs and sex is being glorified wherever we turn. Now I'm not saying those things are completely bad. They are awesome and they feel awesome, BUT it is not the end all and that is not what life is about.

The truth is kept from the people, but much of it is in plain sight. For example, look at the 9/11 Commission Report. Why does it not mention building 7? Because it collapsed, straight down, inward, just like buildings 1 and 2 (the towers), or because it only had fires visible on TWO floors of the 40 something story tall sky scraper? Basically anything about 9/11 that could not be explained in the way those in power wanted it to be explained were left out of the report. Look up the sketchy circumstances (such as not under oath, Bush and Cheney to appear together, etc) under which Bush and Cheney attended the meetings of the 9/11 Commission Report.

Our bias is programmed, and we still think we are free. Good examples of this programming or "anchoring" include, the negative connotations associated with the term "conspiracy" and the way the word is used in the mainstream media, and also through disinformation (publishing fake, outrageous conspiracy theories to discredit the legit ones). Therefore, people have (due to their arrogance) come to ridicule "conspiracy nuts" when it should be perfectly acceptable, if not encouraged to question the government. Also the idea that the government is inherently good. This is enforced through years of elementary and middle school "social studies" classes. Or the fact that the Holocaust can never be questioned. There are tons of worse atrocities throughout history and yet most are under the impression that 1) the Holocaust is the worst atrocity in human history and 2) Mostly Jews were killed. In actuality, about 6 of 12 million killed were Jews, and yet in the official definition of the Holocaust, it only references Jews:

"The Holocaust:

The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire." The Nazis, who came to power in Germany in January 1933, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community."

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005143

This would be perfectly fine if it didn't define "Holocaust" as specifically "the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators." This is a problem because it is not inclusive. If it were to say

"The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately twelve million people by the Nazi regime and its collaborators."

then it would be perfectly acceptable. If Jewish deaths made up of say, 80-90% of the total death toll, it would be acceptable to say define "Holocaust" the way it is in the quote. But since they made up of about half of the total death toll (6 of 12 million), to only recognize them without the others is just plain misleading. There are minor references to other ethnic groups, but they are not part of the definition of Holocaust.

And I say this like it doesn't have to be Jews. If 6 million Poles were killed and 3 million Jews were killed (basically switched numbers), and only Poles were mentioned, there would be something wrong there too. Basically, what I am saying about this is that the Holocaust is misconstrued as a wholly Jewish event. Yes, it is not true, and all who look at the event beyond a superficial level will tell you that, but you have to admit, it is what the Holocaust is associated with, and that the general people who have a superficial conception of the Holocaust directly associates it with Jewish people in concentration camps.

But of course, anything on that subject against the mainstream would make me an anti-semite, even if I were to have a point. To those who believe that the Holocaust must be taught so much so that it won't happen again, are you saying that the wholesale genocide of the tens of millions of Native Americans, the taking of their land, and the destroying of their lifestyle and livelihood is not important enough to want to prevent? So there is some obvious bias here, as it is not generally taught. Again, you have to look at it from the perspective of the average citizen. Just because you know about this, doesn't mean other people all know this fact. Even if they did know, it does not stir up the intense emotions like the Holocaust does. Why? Anchoring. The bias is even more visible when you look to the Asian theater of WWII where the Japanese committed atrocities on such a large scale that it is arguable "worse" than the Holocaust, and yet, there is no overall term to express the events. It is a good example of the bias, as it happened during the same time period. If you really look into the Asian atrocities, you would probably agree with me that it is definitely on the same scale and level of "horribleness" as the Holocaust. The Holocaust is "anchored" into us through the use of trauma, by showing us horrible pictures when we were so young. I mean Anne Frank's diary is pretty scary and intense for an elementary school audience, and many aspects of the Holocaust are probably forever embedded in your memory due to pictures, videos, or things you were forced to read in school at a tender and impressionable age. In fact, most people have never heard of the atrocities in Asia, as it is only mentioned a couple times in school. I just don't think it is right that questioning the Holocaust is so taboo that it is outright illegal in certain countries. And if you do, you are automatically an anti-semite. Now I'm not saying that the Holocaust didn't happen or anything, I just believe that any event, concept, or truth should be subject to query and scrutiny, and that it's sketchy that the Holocaust is not, while everything else in history is heavily debated. I feel like I have to explain myself a whole lot on this issue because it is so deeply anchored to emotions within all of us. I do not dislike Jews or anything like that, just to be clear. I am just pointing out that the conditioned reaction to the Holocaust is a prime example of anchoring. Yet another would be the association of "terrorist" with "Muslim". Terrorists can be of any nationality, faith, and background.

To be clear, here is a link to the wiki about what "anchoring" is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_%28NLP%29

What I have listed is not a "comprehensive list", but rather things that I can list off of the top of my head. If you think about the reasons why you do certain things, why you make certain decisions, or if you read a few sentences of something and think "that's bullshit", and stop reading without considering the other person's point of view, you will begin to realize what I am talking about. Most of our decisions are of free will, but the important ones our views are so biased that we believe we are making our own decisions, but we are merely deciding based upon our preconditioned biases.

Anyway, this is the New World Culture that is being spread all over the world. You can see this as extremely evident in China or other "Westernizing" nations. You can argue that the cultures are different, but what the focuses for the masses are have become one and the same: getting rich so one can better themselves (Me Generation). In fact, if I remember correctly, in China recently, a teenage girl's father committed suicide by jumping off of a bridge because his daughter idolized some celebrity "teen idol" and when she finally met him, he didn't really respond to her in any significant way. Why did he kill himself though? Because he spent a lot of money to create the circumstances in which his daughter got to meet this celebrity, even though the reasoning for her quest is completely superficial (he is soo rich + hot!).

So essentially, in the mind of the father, life without money is not worth living. And this is not even a shocking state of mind, as most people right now believe this too. This is just retarded. How can you let something man-made determine if your life is worth living? We let money have value, not the other way around.

This is the epitome of the New World Culture. Buy buy buy, consume consume consume, enjoy enjoy enjoy, just pay no attention to what's going on outside of your own little bubble.

So to sum up basically what I am saying:

1) The New World Culture serves only to distract and divide the general populace, causing the individual to feel powerless, and also to keep the masses in a state of mind-slavery. It is already in effect and is spreading. Essentially, it serves to take power away from the people and places it in the hands of a few ruling elite. Free your mind.

2) We are programmed with biases through the barrage of the media. In fact, we've become so used to this that most people no longer form their own opinions, but rather take someone else's stance that they agree (mostly) with. Most of the time, people get their opinions and biases from the media. For example, would the American people so readily accept that it was the Osama (a Muslim) who carried out 9/11 if Arabs hadn't been portrayed so negatively in Hollywood movies for the past 40 years, even though there was no hard evidence linking the attack to Osama (if you don't already know the video was fake, you can look it up. It's not Osama in the video, doesn't even look like him. Not even close.), or "Islamofascists" at all? Or that we just accept the fact that Bush lied to us about WMDs and started an unprovoked, unconstitutional, preemptive war against Iraq, and keep on like nothing happened? Why are people not outraged? That isn't even the first time its happened either. Every war since WWI has been sold to the public through manipulation of the people and are based upon lies. It is because we are conditioned to believe that whatever the US does is righteous and good due to the way elementary and middle school is taught (bias). Or maybe we're just used to doublethinking.

Free your mind and beware of doublethink and groupthink. To make any changes in the world, we must first have a revolution of the mind. Sorry this is so incoherent, the whole thing is just too big and all over the place.